I had this epiphany as we were driving home from our trip on
the 21st of July.
As a citizenry of the USA, we have to be responsible when we
are voting for potential leaders. Our
obligation is not just to understand the candidate’s stand on various
issues. Our obligation is to understand
the provisions of the Constitution of the United States. We have an obligation when we elect a
president to decide if that person can successfully recuse himself/herself from
profit making so as to comply with the tenets of the Constitution, especially
the “emoluments clause.” If we elect a
person whose business entanglements are so intricate that this is cannot be
done, then we as citizens have failed our constitutional duties as voters. These issues were brought to the foreground
by the media during the election, but it was presented as an obligation the
potential winner had to deal with, not as an issue the voter had an obligation
to consider when casting their ballot. I
think, in retrospect, that viewpoint was wrong, and we as voters needed to be
challenged to be responsible for making that a consideration when we decide on
our candidates.
No comments:
Post a Comment